This class feels overwhelming pretty much all the way through. I think this is a function of choice, complexity, and pacing. After receiving grades for the first two sections, I settled down a little bit.
Chris replicates the richness and complexity of the internet in both his content and his assignments, and I believe this is an entirely intentional instructional design choice. Beyond simulating the virtual world, it also calls into question our approach to pedagogy, chunking, scaffolding, sequencing, and guiding learners to projects and strategies that are comfortable. Instead, the things we made and worked on routinely took us out of our comfort zones. I think that is an essential experience for educators. What if the better thing for the learners we are responsible for is to make a mess, or to thrash about in confusion, to fail, and to experiment, to engage with a new content creation and each other. Of course, it is a challenging question, how do we scale that appropriately for a six-year-old or a thirty-six-year-old?
Part of feeling overwhelmed is the relative freedom that Chris offers. We are unaccustomed to that in school. So, it is refreshing to see it work. And that again informs a challenge to us as educators. The world might be otherwise.
Engaging with other learners is a potentially messy, unpredictable and difficult to measure an aspect of schooling. In this course, you are forced to participate in that sloppiness, and it works. However, to understand citizenship we have to engage with each other, and I would encourage you to do this earlier and more even than Chris requires. I just completed two courses with Skip Via, and I think an important pedagogic practice that Skip explicitly says and which Chris more implicitly encourages is using the cohort in the role of “teacher” if you have a question then post it to the class rather than the teacher. Again, this is fairly uncomfortable to many of us. We see the role of the teacher as central, not peripheral.
Do not fall behind is perhaps the single biggest and most prescriptive bit of advice I can offer. Spend the time, roughly twelve hours per week, to keep up. You cannot work ahead, and that is probably a good thing. Chris does offer a change of pace, and a shorter unit and many folks took advantage of that to catch up, but better to not fall behind.
I’ve been looking at people’s posts for this part of the final to compare it with my experience, and one thing that really stood out to me was when you mentioned how the freedom that Chris gives can be a bit overwhelming. I also felt this. There were multiple times where I knew the information, but finding a creative way to publicize it was even more of a challenge than learning it. Ultimately, it made me try a few things I would have never tried, which is great, but the process was a bit stressful. Haha.
Sound advice that I’m mostly happy to hear. I do think I erred a bit too much this summer on the implicit side of facilitating connections and redirecting queries to the cohort. Strangely, I think Slack had the opposite effect than I was hoping for in this area…but it’s hard to tease out, as usual with technology, causes and effects.
And…the paradox of choice. It is certainly a cognitively demanding thing!